Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Med Leg J ; 89(2): 102-105, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1127647

ABSTRACT

Recent reports suggest that the use of an outpatient-based procedure (pneumatic retinopexy, PR) for retinal detachment repair should be encouraged within the UK, especially in light of Covid-19 and possible restrictions/competing demands on access to operating theatres. It is therefore essential that patients receive comprehensive information about the risks and benefits of this approach compared with a formal surgical repair either by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and/or scleral buckling (SB). We report a retrospective case series of retinal detachments (RD) satisfying the strict selection criteria for PR but who were managed with formal surgery. Single-operation success rate for PPV/SB at six months follow-up was 93.8% in our study, higher than published primary success rates for PR (60-80%). When counselling patients for possible PR, the ease, speed and potentially reduced co-morbidity of an outpatient-based procedure needs to be balanced against its significantly higher failure rate in comparison with primary PPV/SB.


Subject(s)
Informed Consent/standards , Retina/surgery , Retinal Detachment/surgery , Scleral Buckling/standards , Vitrectomy/standards , Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Female , Humans , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Male , Middle Aged , Retina/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Scleral Buckling/statistics & numerical data , Vitrectomy/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL